Whilst the localism agenda can be viewed as a positive development the majority of people commenting on various websites today from the BBC, Daily Mail, Guardian et al.. are all in the main very scpetical of the Big Society. Many people believe its just a subtle way of introducing more cuts and getting people to volunteer more and provide less state run services.
Whilst there is perhaps some merit in this line of thought the agenda does present perhaps a new opportunity to encourage people to take more responsibility for their neighbourhoods and hold service providers to account.
There no doubt that the current funding situation is of huge concern to many people working in the public sector and indeed to many voluntary sector organisations that rely on state funding or local authority funding. Indeed if we are told is correct then many councils will be at least 25-40% smaller than they are in a matter of a few years. How much will communities be disadvantaged further when these cuts come in?
What further needs to be recognised by government is that there is a cost to volunteering that goes beyond just a time commitment. Volunteers often need training and resourcing in different ways (just like paid staff) and its not yet clear who picks up the tab for this within Big Society? Equally not all community groups by any means suddenly want to become service providers or wish to become and arm of the states delivery mechanism and so a the role of grant funding remains just as important.
There is also a danger that the government only wish to fund new projects (out of whatever little money there might be available) rather than support the existing work of community groups and organisations who are already active and provide a range of help, mutual support and improvement to neighbourhoods across the UK.
It is essential that further opportunities are found to ensure that community organisations can play a greater role influencing the nature of Big Society itself rather than the agenda influencing them.